Urban Agriculture Notes

City Farmer: Canada's Office of Urban Agriculture


URBAN FOOD PRODUCTION:
EVOLUTION, OFFICIAL SUPPORT AND SIGNIFICANCE
(with special reference to Africa)

4.0 SIGNIFICANCE OF URBAN AGRICULTURE

4.6 City Farming's Benefits to Urban Households

4.6.3 Cash Savings

by Luc J.A. Mougeot
© Copyright 1994
International Development Research Centre

In Dar es Salaam, the lower-income group spent 77% of its income on purchasing food; home-cultivation supplied the equivalent of 37% of their income and saved them 50% of their expenditure in food (Sanyal, 1986: 32). In Addis Ababa, cooperative households consumption of vegetables was 10% higher than the urban average and this enabled them to save 10 - 20% of their income (Egziabher, 1994). In Maseru, Lesotho, a detailed survey of 428 plots revealed that, in the late 1980s, 69%, 51% and 32% of low, medium and high-income vegetable producers (respectively) were trying to save money through growing vegetables at home; about 66% of the high-cost, and 29% of the low-cost, district households claimed to sell some of their produce regularly (Greenhow, 1994: 2).

Go back to Table of Contents: Urban Food Production by Luc Mougeot


Go back to Urban Agriculture Notes

revised, June 12,1995

Send comments here cityfarm@unixg.ubc.ca